Food for Thought — 4/22/14

Bill Bowyer’s Philosophy of Economic Recovery

We’ve all heard of the phrase “don’t put all your eggs in one basket.”

For the most part, that’s good advice. In terms of global financial markets, it’s practically soundproof. But for some reason the wonderful people on Wall Street and the Federal Reserve don’t feel the same way.

After four years of pumping tens of billions of dollars into the pockets of the wealthy and well-to-do every month, little progress has been made in turning around the health of the global economy. Many will say that things are much better than they were four years ago, and they would be right to say so.

Of course, when you hit rock bottom, what other way is there to go?

But how far you rise is determined by the method you use to get off the ground. Think about it: when the Wright brothers began pioneering their flying machine, do you think the first models resembled today’s 777′s? Of course not.

Like all systems and their developments we tend to presume that with the passing of time comes an increase in efficiency and productivity. Unless you’re a firm believer in entropy this theory makes sense.

Well, economic systems are really no different. In fact the principles that drive markets are quite similar to those that power your car or that bright yellow star in the sky. Be it internal combustion or nuclear fusion, the concepts are the same. And at the core of those systems is an initiating process that drives the entire system. Call it a heart, an engine or a theory, they’re all the same.

To put it bluntly, the core of today’s economic systems is broken.

Too little emphasis is placed on consumer well-being while too much emphasis is given to printing fiat currency that eventually devalues the entire currency trade. In the end, nothing is really worth anything. Not even the paper it’s printed on.

There are some interesting “conspiracy” theories as to why such a systemic flaw has been allowed to come about over the past few years and many of them have streaks of evidence to support their claims. I’d like to suggest my own little conspiracy, if it isn’t too much trouble to do so.

Forgive me if this seems outlandish, but I’ll do my best to make it short:

In my view, world governments and their economies are falling prey to the super-wealthy-corporate-mentality that is coming to terms with the rapidly approaching realization that the world is running out of resources. Mass consumption, mass waste and mass pollution have reached all-time highs and the subsequent extremes that have followed (extreme weather, marine life die-offs, food waste) are just a stepping stone into the unpredictable future we face.

In order to gain a hold on this grim future, the world’s corporations and governments are working feverishly to seize what remaining resources are left in order to ensure their own survival. It could be a good thing, having these large companies working to salvage the remaining resources so that we have them when they are needed most.

Then again it might lead to something similar that we are seeing in Ukraine. Hotbeds of untapped resources where large amounts of unrest exist only drive prices upward, and as we have seen in the past and continue to see today, it affects everyone; gas prices at home are at unsustainable levels for economic growth despite the vast reserves the United States has.

Food prices are also going up as a result of gas prices as well as drought and cattle losses, and the economy at home is still stalled from this year’s winter. However, the true economic toll from this year’s winter will not be felt for some time yet.

The problems are mounting.

And then there’s the stock market.

So I’ve mentioned the problems and proposed my own little conspiracy about them, big deal, right?

What solutions do you have?

I’m glad I asked myself that, because in accordance with the title of this post, I will now introduce Bill Bowyer’s Philosophy of Economy Recovery.

It’s a neat little philosophy, not too complicated nor too simple.

While the Federal Reserve has spent trillions lining the pockets of wealthy investors and bankers, Bill Bowyer’s philosophy involves a combination of lining the pockets of both investors and consumers. Instead of giving all $80 billion to the wealthy each month, the Federal Reserve invests $20 billion each month (or perhaps $40 billion in the beginning, maybe more) to its citizens in the form of government-issued checks (direct-deposit is an option) that it’s citizens can use to spend or pay off bills. 

The final $60 billion or so is given to the wealthy–they don’t say they’re doing it, but when Bloomberg TV and CNBC refer to it as “free money,” “cocaine” and “the punch bowl,” it’s not too hard to get the point–to invest and put away in large “too-big-to-fail” banks that have since exploded in size since the Great Recession.

Think of the purpose of this philosophy: you tackle the economic recession from both directions, the citizens at the bottom and the wealthy from the top, one big, well-oiled machine working in unison. Of course lower-income families and those with more children would receive more money, but imagine four consecutive years of government-issued checks in your pocket. Of course the checks would probably work out to be around $200-400 each month, but multiply that by 48 and you get around $9600-19,000 in your pocket.

That is, assuming my my math is correct.

Sound like a good idea? I think so, but then again I’m objective.









Vindicius is Ready

Good news everyone, the new website for Vindicius is up and ready.

All changes and renovations have been completed as planned and the site looks great. Here is a list of what is new to Vindicius:

  • 3 new pages- “Join,” “Promotions” and “Recommended.”
  • The “Join” page allows anyone to join the exclusive Vindicius family and receive advanced updates on all things Vindicius, including updates from myself, Bill Bowyer.
  • The “Promotions” page will allow anyone to share their support for Vindicius via social media. Doing so will reward you with a promotion from Vindicius. I will try to keep this page updated on a monthly basis.
  • The “Recommended” page displays other pages and websites that I recommend for viewing. See this page for more details.
  • New Logo: displayed at the top of the website (without the latin “Pauci Sunt Libero”) and on all social media sites for Vindicius.
  • Advertisement for Nathan Dunsmore, screenwriter and graduate of Kendall College of Art and Design specializing in motion graphics and layout design.
  • Blog option only–on the right sidebar there is an area called “The Blog Section” which allows you to subscribe for just blog posts from the website. If you’d like more, see the “Join” page.
  • New theme–”Epic” from Slocum Studios. A very clean and easy to use theme and we’re happy to have it.
  • Connections to our Tumblr, Twitter, Youtube and Facebook pages.

In addition to the new site, I’d like to give a big thank you to for a smooth and effective transfer of this domain, as well as their well-designed integration with WordPress platforms. Also, I’d like to give a warm welcome to the new followers on Facebook and Twitter who are now in the Vindicius network. Welcome to all of you, and thank you for your support.


Welcome to Vindicius,




Absit Iniuria Verbis

Pauci Sunt Libero

Socrates Never Saw This Coming

The future of public education is quite grim. In all honesty it looks like a nightmare from my perspective.

Some things never change, but when I graduated high school (2009) there were several strange similarities with today’s world of education that shouldn’t exist. For one, there is the constant reduction of public school budgets and the cutting of higher education support from state governments. This has a been a steady trend for as long as I’ve paid attention to it and things don’t seem to be changing.

The result?

Higher tuition costs, higher drop-out rates for high school students, crime remains steady if not increasing for the youth bracket of society, student loan debt over 1 trillion, the devaluation of the college degree, the devaluation of salaries and good-paying jobs, permanent school closings and an overall lack of hope and interest in the future with the youth generation.

And that’s just one topic of discussion.

There are several other areas of interest that we could carefully dissect: the lack of interest in school among young people, the trailing effort of technology in less-funded schools, the low quality of teachers, the low quality of the home environment, the curriculum being taught in schools, etc.

The list goes on and on and on.

But the point I’d like to try to get across is the fact that the future of education needs to–and will inevitably will–change. Not this second, or this year or this decade, but soon.

What kinds of changes you ask?

Well I have a few ideas I’d like to share that might make this post a bit more understandable. Two of the three ideas I propose are not original creations of my own but simple expansions of previous inventions that can help streamline education and bring humanity to a new apex. The first of which is called Data Input and Sensory Adaption Teaching (DISAT).

DISAT is designed to make use of the human brain’s ability to process information at both a conscious and subconscious level. One example of this is a story from my college days that seemed to be revolutionary at the time I discovered it, until of course my professor mentioned the counter example of what I did and completely shot my theory all to hell. Here it is:

During the final year of my junior year I was in the process of finishing my German foreign language requirement. I loved the language but hated the studying, particular the endless stream of vocab terms that pummeled my study habits every other work.

During one long and endless week of reading, writing and more writing, I decided that I would experiment with my laptop and try something that I thought might invigorate my lack of interest in studying German vocab terms. With the microphone on my laptop I read the twenty-something new vocab terms to myself in German, then their definitions, in what might possibly be the best version of my monotone voice that I’ve ever done. I then took the sample of the vocab reading (which I recorded in an mp3 converting software) and sent it to my Itunes library. I then took the mp3 and transferred it to my Ipod.

Gutes arbeit, ja?

Well, that night–and the rest of the nights leading up to the quiz–I played that stupid, dull-voiced recording of myself reading out the vocab terms, on repeat, throughout the night and into the morning. I did this for what accounted to be six nights, and it worked wonders for my grade on the quiz: 25/25.

I was so ho-hummed and delighted over myself that I couldn’t help but tell my professor after class (that’s when he passed the papers back) about the new study method I stumbled upon. He then preceded to tell of his days as a young German student and how he was able to remember the weekly vocabulary terms.

“Singing in the shower.”


Apparently there truly is more than one way to skin a cat, and it turns out that both methods aren’t so far apart on the similarity spectrum. Instead of using subconscious repetition, my professor used conscious vocal repetition to implant into his head the very important material that he needed to learn. Well that’s nice and all but for the purposes of this post, I’m gonna give full credit to my method (not that the conscious method is bad or useless or anything of that sort).

Remember our little creation, DISAT? Well, that’s just what my story deals with. Like my German vocab, DISAT would act as a reinforcement teaching technique (or a primary teaching technique, depending on the subject matter) that would utilize the subconscious processing of information that occurs during sleep.

Imagine dreaming in algebraic functions (of course dreams like those might be nightmares for many people).

Still, the process of using sleep time as teaching time can greatly help any student in their developmental process. To me it makes sense, since every student nowadays has an mp3 player or some sort of device that can play an mp3 file. So imagine having a teacher distribute an mp3 file containing their voice (or the dull voice of a company-paid actor hired to teach math through the mp3 file). The student listens to it, then comes to school the next day with the subconscious imprint of yesterday’s lesson. They go to take a test or quiz or fill out a worksheet and BAM!: they somehow, know how, to do it!

These files already exist in some shape or form, but the second part of DISAT is where students use touch screens (mini black boards) to follow along with the lesson plan being taught. This could be especially helpful for math courses.

The technology and method for this is already there and in use, but having students follow along visually, digitally (with their digits) and orally (repeating it to themselves or along with the teacher) is the sensory part of the teaching. Utilizing the senses to create a repetitive imprint in the brain, followed by a subconscious reinforcement to the conscious teaching would allow for the best possible outcome of any student’s learning process. Gone should be the days where watching your teacher scribble on the board is the common form of learning.

Remember the best teachers you had? They got you engaged in what you were learning. What could be more engaging that incorporating the all the senses in your learning process?

Another great thing about DISAT is that it allows for students who have little–if not any–time after they get home from after-school activities to engage in their subjects without a great deal of effort or time. Lulling yourself to sleep to basic quadratic functions after a long basketball game would work wonders.

We also have to consider the possible future developments that could evolve from DISAT. Imprinting data files into the brain via a USB-type connection (wired into the brain stem) would eventually replace the obsolete method of mp3 integration into night-time sleep. Humans would become a walking computer capable of downloading information into their brains either at a price or at birth.

If you’ve seen the movie The Matrix then you’ll remember the training of Neo. It’s commercialized education on a biological and subconscious scale. Both fascinating and ultimately unavoidable in the long term if you ask me.

That of course is just one method of teaching that I believe should be (or could be) utilized in the future. There are two others that I will discuss in this post, both of which are already being used: Youtube and targeted teaching.

Anyone can teach themselves via Youtube today. Try it now and give yourselves a rest from this post: go to Youtube and search for any subject that you can think of, be it quantum mechanics or the alphabet. Whatever you’re looking to learn, it’s there, and chances are the video is just as good–if not better–than the actual teacher in the classroom.

However, teachers are already making use of this tool and I can imagine that, to some extent, it works as a solid reinforcement tool to the related subject material. Visual learning is very poplar and highly useful for many subjects, so there’s a natural draw to it. I know several professors also use the website to upload their lectures and I think it’s a great idea as well.

But try to imagine a world where a Youtube-type website (or Youtube itself) is the primary teaching mechanism for all young people. No schools, no books, no classrooms. Everything self taught and (perhaps) reinforced by the parents or a private tutor. Sound like a possible future?

The last target and potential future from this post is selective teaching. We might know this better as trade schools.

Selective teaching seeks to identify and isolate the subject matters that students are most inclined to learn and study for their careers in life. This is identified at a young age by way of genetics and structured testing and observation over a period of several years. By the time high school rolls along, students should have a concrete understanding of what they want to do with their life. The remaining four years of pre-college schooling are then devoted to this subject area.

This process assumes that public schooling will survive and adapt through the decades ahead, which is an assumption that could prove as nothing more than a silly proposition.

It also leads into the closing statements from this post, and that is the evolution of education over the centuries. Starting with antiquity and the Ancient Greek civilization (as I like to do often), education has seen changes that have been both for the better and for the worse.

Like the process of selective teaching, the ancients often had their citizens focus on a primary area (artisans or merchants) that benefited the community as a whole. Your education was your craft, whether it was pottery, metallurgy or soldiering. As the sciences came to life, education changed to focus on a more fluent study of what elders deemed “necessary” for a well-rounded education.

Of course the ancients had scientific discoveries of their own, but their work was often grouped in what was deemed philosophical notions rather than scientific thought or truth.

Now, states and federal establishments decide what needs to be taught and how much money is dedicated to the learning of it. This leads to the level of one’s education coming from how much is dedicated to the annual budget. Very little is improved but everything is kept in the barren state of what is deemed allowable in that particular region that you find yourself and your child in. As a result there is very little fluidity in the realm of education in the United States today, and the overall future for public education is dim at best because of such a lack of proper structuring.

Personally, my own money is on commercialized data incorporation where people eventually pay for–or steal–knowledge in order to better their lives. Knowledge in the information age is indeed king, but the reign of this particular king has yet to see its throne. Be wary when he takes control.












Food for Thought — 3/17/14

Bill Bowyer’s Theory of Immortality

I admit that I haven’t been putting my full effort into this blog. A lot of what I have written about isn’t what I should be writing about, and what I should be writing about remains entrapped in the thick fortress of a skull that I have.

Well, not anymore. Starting with this post, I will dedicate my full efforts to making Vindicius the best it can be. Why start now you ask? Well, why the hell not I say! And what will I be writing about? What will be the foundation of this blog from here on out?

I call it the “Theory of Immortality,” or as the title reads, “Bill Bowyer’s Theory of Immortality.”

For those unfamiliar with Nietzsche’s eternal return or the concept of dark matter or the model of Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC), do not be troubled. I am no expert or all-knowing truth dispenser here to set you straight. I’m simply going to provide you with one of the many theoretical concepts floating through the foggy caverns of my brain. I hope you enjoy…

With Friedrich Nietzsche, the most profound thought or concept about the universe was the idea of the eternal return. Now this idea was not of Nietzsche’s creation–the concept of an eternally recurring universe dates back to antiquity–but he did advance the notion of an eternal universe during a time when such a theory was rapidly disappearing. All credit aside, the prompt that Nietzsche proposed came in the form of a question rather than a direct assertion. Like Nietzsche, I’d like you to imagine:

What, if some day or night a demon were to steal after you into your loneliest loneliness and say to you: “This life as you now live it and have lived it, you will have to live once more and innumerable times more; and there will be nothing new in it, but every pain and every joy and every thought and sigh and everything unutterably small or great in your life will have to return to you, all in the same succession and sequence — even this spider and this moonlight between the trees, and even this moment and I myself. The eternal hourglass of existence is turned upside down again and again, and you with it, speck of dust!” Would you not throw yourself down and gnash your teeth and curse the demon who spoke thus? Or have you once experienced a tremendous moment when you would have answered him: “You are a god and never have I heard anything more divine”? If this thought gained possession of you, it would change you as you are, or perhaps crush you.” -The Gay Science



That’s Nietzsche’s part. Now we turn to the mysterious dark matter.

Where dark matter fits into my equation is very similar in the way that dark matter fits into the overall equation of the universe as a whole. In other words, my theory is largely based on the concept–and my general theory of–dark matter.

Dark matter, as you may already know, is the mysterious “substance” that seems to contain a large majority of the universe’s mass. The reason it is so mysterious is due to the relative (lack of) knowledge that scientists have of it. Some believe its connection is related more to gravity, others say it’s the building block of the big bang theory. Cool, huh?

Well, dark matter is mysterious in itself, but think of the tiniest of tiniest particles that we as humans have been able to decipher from the cosmic puzzle. Some of these particles are so small that they are nearly impossible to see even with the best of microscopic technology. Still, they exist.

But take a minute and imagine particles so small that they are undecipherable with any current form of man-made technology. Now imagine that these particles are not moving at the speed of light, but instead are at rest with respect to the universe. Now imagine that these particles have no mass. They do not distort the fabric of space-time and are undetectable to the careful observer. We can say that these particles are timeless. Imagine that these particles are in fact we call, dark matter.


A Fascinating View of the Universe


Now we have Conformal Cyclic Cosmology.

When I read Roger Penrose’s “Cycles of Time” I was mesmerized by the magnitude of what Penrose was suggesting. From what I gathered, Penrose was offering a model of our universe that coincided with the notion of the eternal recurrence of the universe. In other words, Penrose was proposing a mathematical solution to the eternal return.

With one big bang leading to eternal expansion, the universe will eventually “thin out” and lead to another big bang event, then another eternal expansion. This process is eternally recurring throughout the perceived measurement of what we call “time.” In short, an eternal universe. It is when you begin talking about the multiverse that this theory becomes truly remarkable (I’ll touch on that shortly).

Penrose’s Cycles of Time

So what is Bill Bowyer’s Theory of Immortality?

It goes a little something like this:

We are all made up of particles that are much much more smaller than the simple atoms that we are so familiar with. I believe that we (along with all creations) are made of particles that are massless, invisible and above all, immortal. They have no time, they do not distort the fabric of space and they will never be detected by our technological creations. Think of “the force” from the Star Wars universe and it might help you to understand what I’m getting at.

We are immortal. 

Think of it as regeneration, rebirth, eternal return, Heaven. Whatever helps you process the concept of it. We are immortal in every sense of the word. When we die, the particles that bind and shape this universe return their origin and continue to push the edges of the map to the furthest reaches where we cannot follow. Nor should we.

We are there.

The journey is endless, the quest forever forged on and on. There is no real “end” to your life, only a beginning of the next that awaits you. Your particles will form into other creations and find their way into spaces that were never thought to exist before. Dimensions will be discovered, new worlds will be formed, and you and I will be present at the apex of another civilization. We will break through time.

We are timeless.

There are no troubles to be found in this life or the next. That which we consist of will recreate itself in the next creation of our universe. You and I will not be a part of it, for that which we are made of will find another home and another creation, and that we be your next life, in another world, in another place. The possibilities are endless, your lifetime is endless, and your journey is eternal.

That is immortality, the life of the eternal soul, and the belief that I hold myself to. Though sometimes I find myself eager to greet the next life, we should never be displeased at the one we find ourselves in. It is the incredible uniqueness of existence that should capture our minds. For without our knowing of it, we can never understand our true potential in the vast arena that is, above all, immortal.

May the force be with you.

May the force be with you.



Bill Bowyer

Look out…

This could be the spark that Russia was waiting for…


Not good news

Four Morals Trailer #2

Four Morals Trailer #1

%d bloggers like this: